Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] IB/{hw,sw}: use rdma_is_user_pd instead of pd uobject pointer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 08:54:22AM +0200, Shamir Rabinovitch wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 02:20:51PM +0200, Shamir Rabinovitch wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 10:36:32AM +0200, Shamir Rabinovitch wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:55:15AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 02:42:42PM +0200, Shamir Rabinovitch wrote:

[...]

> 
> Jason, pushing udata to wherever it was missing was not so bad as I
> thought so this part is OK. I only left with question around your
> request to use 'ib_x->uobject'. If it is OK with you I'd rather to
> switch those which only tell user/kernel to rdma_is_user_pd as was in
> the previous revision. 
> 
> Thanks

Jason, Series #2 (pending on series #1) add ib_udata in ib_device
callbacks. I noticed that if I add those patches to series #1 I can use
ib_udata in almost all the places as you wanted. I have created and
tested this new patch set and it is on my github. I think it can solve
some of the issues you had with v3 of the patch set. Please tell me if
you like me to post this revised patch set here instead of fixing the
current patch set.

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/compare/master...srabinov:for-next%23remove-uobj-from-ib_pd.v4.patch-set-1

Thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux