On 11/2/18, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 04:33:03PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> A patch that looks harmless causes the stack usage of the >> mlx5e_grp_sw_update_stats() >> function to drastically increase with x86 gcc-4.9 and higher (tested up to >> 8.1): >> >> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_stats.c: In function >> ‘mlx5e_grp_sw_update_stats’: >> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_stats.c:216:1: warning: the >> frame size of 1276 bytes is larger than 500 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] > > Why is the stack size so big here? The mlx5e_sw_stats is < 500 bytes > and all the other on-stack stuff looks pretty small? I am not entirely sure, but my analysis indicates that gcc tries loop unrolling or some other optimization that leads to two copies on the stack. >> By splitting out the loop body into a non-inlined function, the stack size >> goes >> back down to under 500 bytes. > > Does this actually reduce the stack consumed or does this just suppress > the warning? It definitely reduces the total stack usage, the separate functions just had the expected stack usage that was a few hundred bytes combined. Arnd