Re: [PATCH for-next 00/11] Some misc fixes for hns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



在 2018/9/29 1:34, Jason Gunthorpe 写道:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 06:01:40PM +0800, Lijun Ou wrote:
>> This patch series includes bug fixes and a small
>> feature for hns.
>>
>> Lijun Ou (11):
>>   RDMA/hns: Bugfix for reserved qp number
>>   RDMA/hns: Submit bad wr when post send wr exception
>>   RDMA/hns: Bugfix for CM test
>>   RDMA/hns: Limit the size of extend sge of sq
>>   RDMA/hns: Configure ecn field of ip header
>>   RDMA/hns: Update some attributes of the RoCE device
>>   RDMA/hns: Limit extend sq sge num
>>   RDMA/hns: Update some fields of qp context
>>   RDMA/hns: Support local invalidate for hip08 in kernel space
>>   RDMA/hns: Add vlan enable bit for hip08
>>   RDMA/hns: Bugfix for atomic operation
> 
> These looked OK, but they don't apply the current tree:
> 
> Applying: RDMA/hns: Bugfix for reserved qp number
> Applying: RDMA/hns: Submit bad wr when post send wr exception
> Applying: RDMA/hns: Bugfix for CM test
> Applying: RDMA/hns: Limit the size of extend sge of sq
> Applying: RDMA/hns: Configure ecn field of ip header
> Applying: RDMA/hns: Update some attributes of the RoCE device
> Applying: RDMA/hns: Limit extend sq sge num
> Applying: RDMA/hns: Update some fields of qp context
> Applying: RDMA/hns: Support local invalidate for hip08 in kernel space
> Applying: RDMA/hns: Add vlan enable bit for hip08
> Applying: RDMA/hns: Bugfix for atomic operation
> error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c).
> error: could not build fake ancestor
> Patch failed at 0011 RDMA/hns: Bugfix for atomic operation
> hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
> When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
> If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
> To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
> 
> Please rebase and resend.
> 
> If you list a git URL in pull requests that exactly matches that git
> tree that was used to make the git send-email I can resolve trivial
> rebases myself, but if git am fails I prefer to give up :)
> 
> Jason
> 
Hi, Jason
  First, sorry for my careless. the patch set is generated on jgg-for-next. because the dependent patch only
exist in this branch.
  I have sendt the next patchset.

Thanks
Lijun Ou

> .
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux