On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 12:54:33PM -0400, Aaron Knister wrote: > While I have nothing of technical value to contribute here, I just wanted to > say thank you! This is something I've long desired. We've been through one > too many BIOS updates that mucked with PCI device enumeration and in > environments with multiple RDMA adapters, particularly when some of the RDMA > adapters face storage devices and different fabrics entirely, it can make > for a real treat of a maintenance window. This is especially true if they > all use the same driver. I admit I'm making this assumption that these > changes would allow one to craft udev rules to create persistent device > mappings. Is that indeed the case? Ultimately, but we need to have a standard naming convention to make that possible (eg like netdev uses with enp0s31f6 type names) Jason
