Re: [PATCH rdma-next v2 1/2] RDMA/core: Implement IB device rename function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 01:30:21PM +0000, Ruhl, Michael J wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-rdma-
> >owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Leon Romanovsky
> >Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 2:46 AM
> >To: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jason Gunthorpe
> ><jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; RDMA mailing list <linux-
> >rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: [PATCH rdma-next v2 1/2] RDMA/core: Implement IB device rename
> >function
> >
> >From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >Generic implementation of IB device rename function.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> > drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h |  1 +
> > drivers/infiniband/core/device.c    | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h
> >b/drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h
> >index f60c7b65aea9..bb9007a0cca7 100644
> >--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h
> >+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h
> >@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ int  ib_device_register_sysfs(struct ib_device *device,
> > 			      int (*port_callback)(struct ib_device *,
> > 						   u8, struct kobject *));
> > void ib_device_unregister_sysfs(struct ib_device *device);
> >+int ib_device_rename(struct ib_device *ibdev, const char *name);
> >
> > typedef void (*roce_netdev_callback)(struct ib_device *device, u8 port,
> > 	      struct net_device *idev, void *cookie);
> >diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> >index d105b9b2d118..5e70f5e1cfd9 100644
> >--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> >+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> >@@ -171,6 +171,31 @@ static struct ib_device
> >*__ib_device_get_by_name(const char *name)
> > 	return NULL;
> > }
> >
> >+int ib_device_rename(struct ib_device *ibdev, const char *name)
> >+{
> >+	struct ib_device *device;
> >+	int ret = 0;
> >+
> >+	if (!strcmp(name, dev_name(&ibdev->dev)))
> >+		return ret;
> >+
> >+	mutex_lock(&device_mutex);
> >+	list_for_each_entry(device, &device_list, core_list) {
> >+		if (!strcmp(name, dev_name(&device->dev))) {
> >+			ret = -EEXIST;
> >+			goto out;
> >+		}
> >+	}
> >+
> >+	ret = device_rename(&ibdev->dev, name);
>
> The comments for device_rename() say:
>
> * Note: Don't call this function.
>
> Is this a concern?

I wrote about it in cover letter:
"This functionality is done through RDMA netlink and implemented by
device_rename() function, despite the comment from 2010, which warns
about downsides of this function, the netdev is still uses, so we will
use too."

I think that it is ok to use as long as netdev uses it and no one
complained about it :)

Thanks

>
> Mike
>
> >+	if (ret)
> >+		goto out;
> >+	strlcpy(ibdev->name, name, IB_DEVICE_NAME_MAX);
> >+out:
> >+	mutex_unlock(&device_mutex);
> >+	return ret;
> >+}
> >+
> > static int alloc_name(struct ib_device *ibdev, const char *name)
> > {
> > 	unsigned long *inuse;
> >--
> >2.14.4
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux