On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 11:53:44PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > Now I'm confused even more. :) I really don't want to add special code to the > > node collector (especially since I don't really know golang), I was wondering > > whether it makes sense to catch the "N/A (no PMA)" values or do something > > more sensible like maybe hiding the counters directory instead, until the hw > > counters are mapped properly. IMHO no values (yet) would be better than illegal > > values. Or instead of exposing wrong (string) values just set them all to 0, which > > would "fix" the problem as well. > > > I prefer to hide it with tested patch with rxe at end of the mail thread. > If there are no objections, I can generate formal patch. > I have 9+ pending patches for cleanup and fixes in sysfs.c file to come in Leon's queue this week. I prefer this approach also Jason
