On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 16:24:50 -0700 Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As for the patch, why don't you simply keep a cq->wq pointer > that would either be ib_comp_wq or ib_comp_unbound_wq? Then you > wouldn't need to duplicate the handlers. I am modifying the patch to do as you suggested. -Jack
