Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] Request for Comments on SoftiWarp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: -----

>To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
>From: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: 07/16/2018 09:08PM
>Cc: "'Bernard Metzler'" <BMT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Leon Romanovsky'"
><leon@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] Request for Comments on SoftiWarp
>
>
>On 3/1/2018 11:18 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:28:00AM -0600, Steve Wise wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:29:04AM -0600, Steve Wise wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe to add a network interface to a soft-rdma device like rxe,
>we
>>> could
>>>> create a syntax like this:
>>>>> rdma link set rxe_eth0 dev eth0
>>>> More like:
>>>>
>>>> rdma link add rxe_eth0 type rxe dev eth0
>>>>
>>>> 'type rxe' triggers the kernel to dispatch to the rxe or siw
>driver to
>>>> create the interface.
>>> Type doesn't sound right though.  in the current rdma synax, it
>would be
>>> 'dev'.  Maybe:
>>>
>>> rdma link add rxe_eth0 dev rxe netdev eth0
>> Type is the consistent tag with 'ip link add'.
>
>Hey guys,
>
>I'm starting to think about how to implement 'rdma link add/delete'
>for
>rxe.  Does it make sense to add new members to the rdma_nldev_command
>enum in include/uapi/rdma/rdma_netlink.h for adding and deleting
>soft-rdma links to netdev interfaces?  Something like
>RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_LINK_ADD and RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_LINK_DEL?  Then add
>handlers
>to the nldev_cb_table array in drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c.
>Can
>we assume there is only one soft-rdma driver for each rdma
>transport? 
>That would enable a simple core->driver dispatch via an array of
>driver-specific handler functions that are indexed by the soft-rdma
>transport type.  Or do we need something more general? 
>
>Just thinking out loud here.  What do you all think?
>
Hey Steve,

Would be great if you would bring that thing forward. Highly
appreciated!
I would as well assume only one software rdma driver per 
rdma transport. But in your proposed syntax, there is a 
driver name (rxe) anyway, so multiple drivers could also be 
selectable...? Actually, shall we specify the rdma transport at
all, or is that a property the device is providing during
registration?


Bernard.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux