Re: [PATCH rdma-next 1/2] RDMA/core: Check for verbs callbacks before using them

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 01:26:29PM +0300, Kamal Heib wrote:
> Make sure the providers implement the verbs callbacks before calling
> them, otherwise return -EOPNOTSUPP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kamal Heib <kamalheib1@xxxxxxxxx>
>  drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c        | 10 ++++++----
>  drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c |  3 ++-
>  drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c      |  6 ++++++
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c
> index 34e9b2768324..e528387605c8 100644
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c
> @@ -882,10 +882,12 @@ static int handle_outgoing_dr_smp(struct ib_mad_agent_private *mad_agent_priv,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* No GRH for DR SMP */
> -	ret = device->process_mad(device, 0, port_num, &mad_wc, NULL,
> -				  (const struct ib_mad_hdr *)smp, mad_size,
> -				  (struct ib_mad_hdr *)mad_priv->mad,
> -				  &mad_size, &out_mad_pkey_index);
> +	ret = device->process_mad ?
> +		device->process_mad(device, 0, port_num, &mad_wc, NULL,
> +				    (const struct ib_mad_hdr *)smp, mad_size,
> +				    (struct ib_mad_hdr *)mad_priv->mad,
> +				    &mad_size, &out_mad_pkey_index) :
> +		-EOPNOTSUPP;

And this shouldn't be needed here, though I'm not entirely show how
come.. iwarp devices should be blocked form using umad entirely.

Maybe ib_create_send_mad() should fail if process_mad isn't defined?
Not sure. Do all rocee and IB drivers define it?

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux