Re: [PATCH] ib_srpt: use kvmalloc to allocate ring pointers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 08:39 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 04:51:08PM +0300, Jan Dakinevich wrote:
> > An array of pointers to SRPT contexts in ib_device is over 30KiB even
> > in default case, in which an amount of contexts is 4095. The patch
> > is intended to weed out large contigous allocation for non-DMA memory.
> 
> kvmalloc* doesn't "weed out" large contiguous allocations, but tries to
> allocate them and gracefully fallback to vmalloc if kmalloc fails.
> 
> More on that, for allocations less than page (64KB for PowerPC), it will
> not call to vmalloc at all, which is fine too, because pages granularity.
> 
> If you want to get rid of "contiguous allocations", use vmalloc instead.

vmalloc() has a very significant disadvantage compared to kvmalloc(): with
vmalloc() it is guaranteed that memory allocations will be slow. That's not
the case for kvmalloc() if the number of bytes that is allocated is small
enough.

Bart.




��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux