Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 0/4] GRH required

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 03:48:57PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 03:57:47PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This series from Artemy and Jason fixes long standing problem caused by
> > overloaded bit in PortInfo CapabilityMask in the kernel.
> >
> > Such problem was discovered while Artemy proposed a way to expose
> > grh_required field to user space applications through rdma-core.
> >
> > In addition to the fixes, this series exposes "GRH required" flag.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Artemy Kovalyov (2):
> >   RDMA: Validate grh_required when handling AVs
> >   IB/uverbs: Pass IB_UVERBS_QPF_GRH_REQUIRED to user space
> >
> > Jason Gunthorpe (2):
> >   RDMA: Fix storage of PortInfo CapabilityMask in the kernel
> >   RDMA/hfi1: Move grh_required into update_sm_ah
>
> Applied to for-next

Thanks for applying,
Before you are updating for-next, can you please fix typos spotted by Hal?

Thanks

>
> Thanks,
> Jason

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux