On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 03:34:38PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 11:23:41AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Hi, > > > > This is bunch of patches trigged by running syzkaller internally. > > > > I'm sending them based on rdma-next mainly for two reasons: > > 1, Most of the patches fix the old issues and it doesn't matter when > > they will hit the Linus's tree: now or later in a couple of weeks > > during merge window. > > 2. They interleave with code cleanup, mlx5-next patches and Michael's > > feedback on flow counters series. > > > > Thanks > > > > Leon Romanovsky (12): > > RDMA/uverbs: Protect from attempts to create flows on unsupported QP > > RDMA/uverbs: Fix slab-out-of-bounds in ib_uverbs_ex_create_flow > > I applied these two to for-rc > > > RDMA/uverbs: Check existence of create_flow callback > > RDMA/verbs: Drop kernel variant of create_flow > > RDMA/verbs: Drop kernel variant of destroy_flow > > net/mlx5: Rate limit errors in command interface > > RDMA/uverbs: Don't overwrite NULL pointer with ZERO_SIZE_PTR > > RDMA/umem: Don't check for negative return value of dma_map_sg_attrs() > > RDMA/uverbs: Remove redundant check > > These to for-next Jason, We would like to see patch "[PATCH mlx5-next 05/12] net/mlx5: Rate limit errors in command interface" in out mlx5-next. Is it possible at this point to drop it from for-next, so I'll be able to take it into mlx5-next? Thanks > > > overflow.h: Add arithmetic shift helper > > RDMA/mlx5: Fix shift overflow in mlx5_ib_create_wq > > RDMA/mlx5: Reuse existed shift_overlow helper > > And these will have to be respun. > > Thanks, > Jason
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
