On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 09:03:16AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 09:16:56 +0300 > Moni Shoua <monis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Good point. > > > (I hate the sysfs interface anyway.) > > > Will be looking into it. > > > > > Sure, go ahead but remember that bonding driver still uses the sysfs > > interface and probably for a good reason. So, consider this when you > > make plans. > > > > ??? > Not sure what this got to do with it... > > Anyway, current plan is to hook into iproute2 'rdma' tool; we already > have: > > ./rdma/rdma link show > 1/1: rxe0/1: state ACTIVE physical_state LINK_UP netdev eth1 > 2/1: rxe1/1: state ACTIVE physical_state LINK_UP netdev eth2 > > Plan is to add an interface > > rdma link add <dev/port> netdev <ifname> > rdma link del <dev/port> netdev <ifname> > > to cover the functionality of the current sysfs interface. > D'accord? > +1, please don't forget ability to provide netdev_index in addition to netdev name. It will be helpful for automatic tools. Thanks > Cheers, > > Hannes > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
