From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2018 00:17:37 +0000 > On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 17:13 -0700, saeedm@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> Hey Dave, this series was meant to go to mlx5-next tree as stated in >> the cover letter and patches titles "[PATCH V2 mlx5-next 0/2]". >> >> It is ok you applied those patches to net-next this time, but for >> next >> time I would like to apply them myself to mlx5-next and send a clean >> pull request later to both rdma and net trees. > > Sorry please ignore, I just saw that this was sorted out .. :). > Thanks A lot ! > >> Is there a way for me to mark them as delegated in patchwork ? >> I see that i have "update Properties" option in patchwork but i don't >> know how to use it or whether I am allowed to do anything with it. > > It would be great if we can mark such patches in patchwork though.. I really don't like it when others adjust patchwork state on me. Florian Fainelli did it for a brief time for some of his own patches and it caused a lot of confusion for me, so I asked him to stop. Let's just make sure that the Subject line says mlx5-next or whatever instead of net-next and I'll be mindful in such situations. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
