Re: [RFC 1/5] nvme-rdma: use ib_client API to wrap ib_device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 05/15/2018 06:15 PM, Roman Pen wrote:
ib_client API provides a way to wrap an ib_device with a specific ULP
structure.  Using that API local lists and mutexes can be completely
avoided and allocation/removal paths become a bit cleaner.

Signed-off-by: Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Cc: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
index 1eb4438a8763..f003c8d77846 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
@@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ struct nvme_rdma_device {
  	struct ib_device	*dev;
  	struct ib_pd		*pd;
  	struct kref		ref;
-	struct list_head	entry;
  };
struct nvme_rdma_qe {
@@ -124,9 +123,7 @@ static inline struct nvme_rdma_ctrl *to_rdma_ctrl(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
  	return container_of(ctrl, struct nvme_rdma_ctrl, ctrl);
  }
-static LIST_HEAD(device_list);
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(device_list_mutex);
-
+static struct ib_client nvme_rdma_ib_client;
  static LIST_HEAD(nvme_rdma_ctrl_list);
  static DEFINE_MUTEX(nvme_rdma_ctrl_mutex);
@@ -325,17 +322,14 @@ static void nvme_rdma_free_dev(struct kref *ref)
  	struct nvme_rdma_device *ndev =
  		container_of(ref, struct nvme_rdma_device, ref);
- mutex_lock(&device_list_mutex);
-	list_del(&ndev->entry);
-	mutex_unlock(&device_list_mutex);
-
+	ib_set_client_data(ndev->dev, &nvme_rdma_ib_client, NULL);
  	ib_dealloc_pd(ndev->pd);
  	kfree(ndev);
  }
-static void nvme_rdma_dev_put(struct nvme_rdma_device *dev)
+static int nvme_rdma_dev_put(struct nvme_rdma_device *dev)
  {
-	kref_put(&dev->ref, nvme_rdma_free_dev);
+	return kref_put(&dev->ref, nvme_rdma_free_dev);
  }
static int nvme_rdma_dev_get(struct nvme_rdma_device *dev)
@@ -348,43 +342,36 @@ nvme_rdma_find_get_device(struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id)
  {
  	struct nvme_rdma_device *ndev;
- mutex_lock(&device_list_mutex);
-	list_for_each_entry(ndev, &device_list, entry) {
-		if (ndev->dev->node_guid == cm_id->device->node_guid &&
-		    nvme_rdma_dev_get(ndev))
-			goto out_unlock;
-	}
+	ndev = ib_get_client_data(cm_id->device, &nvme_rdma_ib_client);
+	if (ndev && WARN_ON(!nvme_rdma_dev_get(ndev)))
+		ndev = NULL;
+
+	return ndev;
+}
+
+static struct nvme_rdma_device *
+nvme_rdma_alloc_device(struct ib_device *device)
+{
+	struct nvme_rdma_device *ndev;
ndev = kzalloc(sizeof(*ndev), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!ndev)
-		goto out_err;
+	if (unlikely(!ndev))
+		return NULL;
- ndev->dev = cm_id->device;
+	ndev->dev = device;
  	kref_init(&ndev->ref);
ndev->pd = ib_alloc_pd(ndev->dev,
  		register_always ? 0 : IB_PD_UNSAFE_GLOBAL_RKEY);
-	if (IS_ERR(ndev->pd))
+	if (unlikely(IS_ERR(ndev->pd)))
  		goto out_free_dev;
- if (!(ndev->dev->attrs.device_cap_flags &
-	      IB_DEVICE_MEM_MGT_EXTENSIONS)) {
-		dev_err(&ndev->dev->dev,
-			"Memory registrations not supported.\n");
-		goto out_free_pd;
-	}

Why was this removed from here? I think it should live in
nvme_rdma_alloc_device.

+	ib_set_client_data(ndev->dev, &nvme_rdma_ib_client, ndev);

This however, should be done in the call-site after this completes
successfully.

@@ -2017,22 +2004,27 @@ static struct nvmf_transport_ops nvme_rdma_transport = {
  	.create_ctrl	= nvme_rdma_create_ctrl,
  };
-static void nvme_rdma_remove_one(struct ib_device *ib_device, void *client_data)
+static void nvme_rdma_add_one(struct ib_device *ib_device)
  {
-	struct nvme_rdma_ctrl *ctrl;
  	struct nvme_rdma_device *ndev;
-	bool found = false;
- mutex_lock(&device_list_mutex);
-	list_for_each_entry(ndev, &device_list, entry) {
-		if (ndev->dev == ib_device) {
-			found = true;
-			break;
-		}
+	if (!(ib_device->attrs.device_cap_flags &
+	      IB_DEVICE_MEM_MGT_EXTENSIONS)) {
+		pr_err("Memory registrations not supported.\n");
+		/* Argh */
+		return;
  	}
-	mutex_unlock(&device_list_mutex);
+	ndev = nvme_rdma_alloc_device(ib_device);
+	/* Argh!! */
+	WARN_ON(!ndev);

NO need for the WARN_ON, either this is a resource allocation problem
which would manifest anyways, or this is a device we are not interested
in using. I suggest we make this a debug log.

+}
+
+static void nvme_rdma_remove_one(struct ib_device *ib_device, void *client_data)
+{
+	struct nvme_rdma_device *ndev = client_data;
+	struct nvme_rdma_ctrl *ctrl;
- if (!found)
+	if (unlikely(!ndev))
  		return;
/* Delete all controllers using this device */
@@ -2045,10 +2037,12 @@ static void nvme_rdma_remove_one(struct ib_device *ib_device, void *client_data)
  	mutex_unlock(&nvme_rdma_ctrl_mutex);
flush_workqueue(nvme_delete_wq);
+	WARN_ON(!nvme_rdma_dev_put(ndev));
  }
static struct ib_client nvme_rdma_ib_client = {
  	.name   = "nvme_rdma",
+	.add    = nvme_rdma_add_one,
  	.remove = nvme_rdma_remove_one
  };

Overall I think this is a nice approach :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux