Re: [PATCH mlx5-next v2 11/13] IB/mlx5: Add flow counters binding support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/30/2018 6:06 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 03:31:34PM +0300, Yishai Hadas wrote:
On 5/29/2018 10:56 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:09:15PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/mlx5-abi.h b/include/uapi/rdma/mlx5-abi.h
index 508ea8c82da7..ef3f430a7050 100644
+++ b/include/uapi/rdma/mlx5-abi.h
@@ -443,4 +443,18 @@ enum {
  enum {
  	MLX5_IB_CLOCK_INFO_V1              = 0,
  };
+
+struct mlx5_ib_flow_counters_data {
+	__aligned_u64   counters_data;
+	__u32   ncounters;
+	__u32   reserved;
+};
+
+struct mlx5_ib_create_flow {
+	__u32   ncounters_data;
+	__u32   reserved;
+	/* Following are counters data based on ncounters_data */
+	struct mlx5_ib_flow_counters_data data[];
+};
+
  #endif /* MLX5_ABI_USER_H */

This uapi thing still needs to be fixed as I pointed out before.

In V3 we can go with below, no change in memory layout but it can clarify
the code/usage.

struct mlx5_ib_flow_counters_desc {
         __u32   description;
         __u32   index;
};

struct mlx5_ib_flow_counters_data {
         RDMA_UAPI_PTR(struct mlx5_ib_flow_counters_desc *, counters_data);
         __u32   ncounters;
         __u32   reserved;
};

OK, this is what I asked for originally..

struct mlx5_ib_create_flow {
         __u32   ncounters_data;
         __u32   reserved;
         /* Following are counters data based on ncounters_data */
         struct mlx5_ib_flow_counters_data data[];


I still can't figure out why this should be a 2d array.

This comes to support the future case of multiple counters objects/specs
passed with the same flow. There is a need to differentiate mapping data for
each counters object and that is done via the 'ncounters_data' field and the
2d array.

This still doesn't make any sense to me. How are these multiple
counters objects/specs going to be identified?

Basically, what does the array index for data[] mean? Should it match
the spec index from the main verb or something?


Each entry in the data[] should match a corresponding counter object that was pointed by a counters spec upon the flow creation.

This is a good place for a comment, since the intention is completely
opaque here.

Sure, we'll add comment to clarify the above.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux