On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 09:38:13AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 2:09 AM Roman Penyaev < > roman.penyaev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Should I resend current patch with more clear comments about how careful > > caller should be with a leaking pointer? > > No. Even if we go your way, there is *one* single user, and that one is > special and needs to take a lot more care. > > Just roll your own version, and make it an inline function like I've asked > now now many times, and add a shit-ton of explanations of why it's safe to > use in that *one* situation. > > I don't want any crazy and unsafe stuff in the generic header file that > absolutely *nobody* should ever use. Completely agreed! I was perhaps foolishly assuming that they would be making that adjustment based on earlier emails, but yes, I should have explicitly stated this requirement in my earlier reply. Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
