Re: [pull request][for-next 00/15] Mellanox, mlx5 core and netdev updates 2018-05-17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 11:21 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 01:03:51PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 18:22:43 -0700
> > 
> > > Below you can find two pull requests,
> > > 
> > > 1. mlx5 core updates to be shared for both netdev and RDMA,
> > > (patches 1..9)
> > >  which is based on the last mlx5-next pull request
> > >  
> > > The following changes since commit
> > > a8408f4e6db775e245f20edf12b13fd58cc03a1c:
> > > 
> > >   net/mlx5: fix spelling mistake: "modfiy" -> "modify" (2018-05-
> > > 04 12:11:51 -0700)
> > > 
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > 
> > >  
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git
> > > tags/mlx5-updates-2018-05-17
> > > 
> > > for you to fetch changes up to
> > > 10ff5359f883412728ba816046ee3a696625ca02:
> > > 
> > >   net/mlx5e: Explicitly set source e-switch in offloaded TC rules
> > > (2018-05-17 14:17:35 -0700)
> > > 
> > > 2. mlx5e netdev updates only for net-next branch (patches 10..15)
> > > based on net-next
> > > and the above pull request.
> > > 
> > > The following changes since commit
> > > 538e2de104cfb4ef1acb35af42427bff42adbe4d:
> > > 
> > >   Merge branch 'net-Allow-more-drivers-with-COMPILE_TEST' (2018-
> > > 05-17 17:11:07 -0400)
> > > 
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > 
> > >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/saeed/linux.git
> > > tags/mlx5e-updates-2018-05-17
> > > 
> > > for you to fetch changes up to
> > > a228060a7c9ab88597eeac131e4578595d5d46ae:
> > > 
> > >   net/mlx5e: Add HW vport counters to representor ethtool stats
> > > (2018-05-17 17:48:54 -0700)
> > > 
> > > Dave, for your convenience you can either pull 1. and then 2. or
> > > pull 2.
> > > directly.
> > 
> > Looks good.
> > 
> > I pulled 1 then I pulled 2.  That seemed to work
> > well.  Particularly
> > it allowed me to capture the two different merge commit messages
> > one
> > by one.
> 
> Does this double up the merge commit though? I see this in Saeed's
> tags/mlx5e-updates-2018-05-17 ?
> 
> commit 260ab7042e24ccd4407985c6e775e39d064fab2b
> Merge: 538e2de104cfb4 10ff5359f88341
> Author: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Thu May 17 17:47:09 2018 -0700
> 
>     Merge tag 'mlx5-updates-2018-05-17' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux
>     
>     mlx5-updates-2018-05-17
>     
>     mlx5 core dirver updates for both net-next and rdma-next
> branches.
>     
>     From Christophe JAILLET, first three patches to use kvfree where
> needed.
>     
>     From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     
>     Next six patches from Roi and Co adds support for merged
>     sriov e-switch which comes to serve cases where both PFs, VFs set
>     on them and both uplinks are to be used in single v-switch SW
> model.
>     When merged e-switch is supported, the per-port e-switch is
> logically
>     merged into one e-switch that spans both physical ports and all
> the VFs.
>     
>     This model allows to offload TC eswitch rules between VFs
> belonging
>     to different PFs (and hence have different eswitch affinity), it
> also
>     sets the some of the foundations needed for uplink LAG support.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> And this in your tree:
> 
> commit 3888ea4e2f1fb2f61e5418adf4b8332107ac0c8f
> Merge: 2c47a65b7009eb 10ff5359f88341
> Author: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Fri May 18 13:00:08 2018 -0400
> 
>     Merge tag 'mlx5-updates-2018-05-17' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux
>     
>     Saeed Mahameed says:
>     
>     ====================
>     mlx5-updates-2018-05-17
>     
>     mlx5 core dirver updates for both net-next and rdma-next
> branches.
>     
>     From Christophe JAILLET, first three patche to use kvfree where
> needed.
>     
>     From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     
>     Next six patches from Roi and Co adds support for merged
>     sriov e-switch which comes to serve cases where both PFs, VFs set
>     on them and both uplinks are to be used in single v-switch SW
> model.
>     When merged e-switch is supported, the per-port e-switch is
> logically
>     merged into one e-switch that spans both physical ports and all
> the VFs.
>     
>     This model allows to offload TC eswitch rules between VFs
> belonging
>     to different PFs (and hence have different eswitch affinity), it
> also
>     sets the some of the foundations needed for uplink LAG support.
>     ====================
>     
>     Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I think the trouble is the Saeed needs to merge the 'core' stuff to
> create the non-core patches for netdev (just like we want to do for
> rdma)
> 
> So maybe netdev should take the #2 pull request and rdma should
> take number #1?
> 

If the concern is the log message split, then yes pulling #2 is
sufficient since #1 
"Merge tag 'mlx5-updates-2018-05-17' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux"
Already part of #2.

and we can avoid the duplicate log message for #1

> This seems to be working OK from RDMA's side, we have much less
> netdev
> stuff in our tree now which seems good!
> 
> Thanks,
> Jason��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux