Am Dienstag, den 15.05.2018, 13:29 -0600 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe: > We don't build some providers if DMA is not supported, but we still > installed the renamed kernel header in this case. This causes package > builds to fail because the sed script in debian/rules will remove the > mlx5 > stuff indiscriminately if DMA is not supported. > > Simple fix is to be consistent and not include any mlx5 stuff if mlx5 > is > not built. > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > kernel-headers/CMakeLists.txt | 1 - > providers/mlx5/CMakeLists.txt | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Benjamin, this should fix the build failures I saw from the debian > autobuilder.. > > What do you think? Yes that is one way to fix the build failure, but it would also be okay if you decide that you always want to install all headers. -- Benjamin Drung System Developer Debian & Ubuntu Developer ProfitBricks GmbH Greifswalder Str. 207 10405 Berlin Email: benjamin.drung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx URL: https://www.profitbricks.de Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 125506 B Geschäftsführer: Achim Weiss, Matthias Steinberg, Christoph Steffens -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
