On 5/14/2018 11:12 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 04:36:57PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
From: Matan Barak <matanb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
When CONFIG_INFINIBAND_USER_ACCESS is disabled, we need to declare
uverbs_idr_class and uverbs_fd_class. This is mandatory, as provider
drivers could use UVERBS_ATTR_FD and UVERBS_ATTR_IDR macros.
Exporting them as all zeros structures to allow compiling provider
drivers without being dependent on ib_uverbs.
Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c | 2 ++
include/rdma/uverbs_types.h | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c
index a6e904973ba8..8035a0a7564c 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c
@@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ const struct uverbs_obj_type_class uverbs_idr_class = {
*/
.needs_kfree_rcu = true,
};
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(uverbs_idr_class);
static void _uverbs_close_fd(struct ib_uobject_file *uobj_file)
{
@@ -719,6 +720,7 @@ const struct uverbs_obj_type_class uverbs_fd_class = {
.remove_commit = remove_commit_fd_uobject,
.needs_kfree_rcu = false,
};
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(uverbs_fd_class);
struct ib_uobject *uverbs_get_uobject_from_context(const struct uverbs_obj_type *type_attrs,
struct ib_ucontext *ucontext,
diff --git a/include/rdma/uverbs_types.h b/include/rdma/uverbs_types.h
index cc04ec65588d..7c6d1e99c010 100644
--- a/include/rdma/uverbs_types.h
+++ b/include/rdma/uverbs_types.h
@@ -147,8 +147,13 @@ struct uverbs_obj_fd_type {
int flags;
};
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INFINIBAND_USER_ACCESS)
extern const struct uverbs_obj_type_class uverbs_idr_class;
extern const struct uverbs_obj_type_class uverbs_fd_class;
+#else
+static const struct uverbs_obj_type_class uverbs_idr_class = {};
+static const struct uverbs_obj_type_class uverbs_fd_class = {};
+#endif
Hurm.
This doesn't make much sense, if there is no user access then we
shouldn't be building specs at all, or the _class should continue to
be defined?
I don't want to build specs with pointers to bogus data, that seems
like a great way to create runtime bugs.
Agree, V1 won't include this part of the patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html