On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 09:42:31AM +0800, Yanjun Zhu wrote: > > > On 2018/5/13 19:49, Tom Talpey wrote: > >On 5/12/2018 9:00 PM, Yanjun Zhu wrote: > >> > >> > >>On 2018/5/12 22:24, Tom Talpey wrote: > >>>On 5/12/2018 9:54 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > >>>>When udp port 4791 is blocked, the udp port 4891 is used and vice > >>>>versa. > >>> > >>>Port 4891 is currently unassigned in the IANA registry. Do you intend > >>>to request this? > >>Yes. If this patch is merged, I will request it. > > > >That is improper - the standards assignment must come first. In my > >opinion the firewall reasoning will be rejected by the IANA, and > >there's no guarantee what number will be assigned in any case. The > >process is defined here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6335 > > > >Do the hard stuff first; develop a solid justification why this is > >a good and proper approach, before deploying it on the IP Internet > >by making it part of Linux. > Thanks a lot for your suggestions. I will request the udp port now. You need to start with IBTA as they control the standard and IETF probably won't give you a ROCE related port without their approval either. Nor are we likely to add non-standard ROCE behavior to rxe. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
