Hi, all
rxe_send
ip_local_out
__ip_local_out
nf_hook_slow
In the above call process, nf_hook_slow drops and frees skb, then -EPERM
is returned when iptables rules(iptables -I OUTPUT -p udp --dport 4791
-j DROP) is set.
If skb->users is not changed in softroce, kfree_skb should not be called
in this module.
I will make further investigations about other error handler after
ip_local_out.
If I am wrong, please correct me.
Any reply is appreciated.
Zhu Yanjun
On 2018/4/20 13:46, Yanjun Zhu wrote:
On 2018/4/20 10:19, Doug Ledford wrote:
On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 10:01 -0400, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
When skb is dropped by iptables rules, the skb is freed at the same
time
-EPERM is returned. So in softroce, it is not necessary to free skb
again.
Or else, crash will occur.
The steps to reproduce:
server client
--------- ---------
|1.1.1.1|<----rxe-channel--->|1.1.1.2|
--------- ---------
On server: rping -s -a 1.1.1.1 -v -C 10000 -S 512
On client: rping -c -a 1.1.1.1 -v -C 10000 -S 512
The kernel configs CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK and
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS are enabled on both server and client.
When rping runs, run the following command in server:
iptables -I OUTPUT -p udp --dport 4791 -j DROP
Without this patch, crash will occur.
CC: Srinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@xxxxxxxxxx>
I have no reason to doubt your analysis, but if there are a bunch of
error paths for net_xmit and they all return with your skb still being
valid and holding a reference, and then one oddball that returns with
your skb already gone, that just sounds like a mistake waiting to happen
(not to mention a bajillion special cases sprinkled everywhere to deal
with this apparent inconsistency).
Can we get a netdev@ confirmation on this being the right solution?
Yes. I agree with you.
After iptables rule "iptables -I OUTPUT -p udp --dport 4791 -j DROP",
the skb is freed in this function
/* Returns 1 if okfn() needs to be executed by the caller,
* -EPERM for NF_DROP, 0 otherwise. Caller must hold rcu_read_lock. */
int nf_hook_slow(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_hook_state *state,
const struct nf_hook_entries *e, unsigned int s)
{
unsigned int verdict;
int ret;
for (; s < e->num_hook_entries; s++) {
verdict = nf_hook_entry_hookfn(&e->hooks[s], skb, state);
switch (verdict & NF_VERDICT_MASK) {
case NF_ACCEPT:
break;
case NF_DROP:
kfree_skb(skb); <----here, skb is freed
ret = NF_DROP_GETERR(verdict);
if (ret == 0)
ret = -EPERM;
return ret;
case NF_QUEUE:
ret = nf_queue(skb, state, e, s, verdict);
if (ret == 1)
continue;
return ret;
default:
/* Implicit handling for NF_STOLEN, as well as
any other
* non conventional verdicts.
*/
return 0;
}
}
return 1;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(nf_hook_slow);
If I am wrong, please correct me.
And my test environment is still there, any solution can be verified
in it.
Zhu Yanjun
---
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c | 3 +++
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c | 5 +++--
drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c | 9 ++++++---
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c
b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c
index 9da6e37..2094434 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_net.c
@@ -511,6 +511,9 @@ int rxe_send(struct rxe_pkt_info *pkt, struct
sk_buff *skb)
if (unlikely(net_xmit_eval(err))) {
pr_debug("error sending packet: %d\n", err);
+ /* -EPERM means the skb is dropped and freed. */
+ if (err == -EPERM)
+ return -EPERM;
return -EAGAIN;
}
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
index 7bdaf71..9d2efec 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
@@ -727,8 +727,9 @@ int rxe_requester(void *arg)
rollback_state(wqe, qp, &rollback_wqe,
rollback_psn);
- if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
- kfree_skb(skb);
+ if ((ret == -EAGAIN) || (ret == -EPERM)) {
+ if (ret == -EAGAIN)
+ kfree_skb(skb);
rxe_run_task(&qp->req.task, 1);
goto exit;
}
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
index a65c996..6bdf9b2 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
@@ -742,7 +742,8 @@ static enum resp_states read_reply(struct rxe_qp
*qp,
err = rxe_xmit_packet(rxe, qp, &ack_pkt, skb);
if (err) {
pr_err("Failed sending RDMA reply.\n");
- kfree_skb(skb);
+ if (err != -EPERM)
+ kfree_skb(skb);
return RESPST_ERR_RNR;
}
@@ -956,7 +957,8 @@ static int send_ack(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct
rxe_pkt_info *pkt,
err = rxe_xmit_packet(rxe, qp, &ack_pkt, skb);
if (err) {
pr_err_ratelimited("Failed sending ack\n");
- kfree_skb(skb);
+ if (err != -EPERM)
+ kfree_skb(skb);
}
err1:
@@ -1141,7 +1143,8 @@ static enum resp_states
duplicate_request(struct rxe_qp *qp,
if (rc) {
pr_err("Failed resending result.
This flow is not handled - skb ignored\n");
rxe_drop_ref(qp);
- kfree_skb(skb_copy);
+ if (rc != -EPERM)
+ kfree_skb(skb_copy);
rc = RESPST_CLEANUP;
goto out;
}
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
