RE: [PATCH v3 rdma-next 0/5] Provider-specific resource tracking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > I was hoping to look at it this week, haven't even read it yet, OFA
> > > conference and all.
> >
> > I'll wait until Jason has had a chance to review it, but I don't have
> > any significant complaints.
> 
> I was going to read them, but they don't apply:
> 
> Applying bundle of 5 patches /home/jgg/Downloads/bundle-
> 743302250d4623f7e2a49336781d3881ca444b36.mbox
> Applying: RDMA/nldev: Add explicit pad attribute
> Applying: RDMA/nldev: add provider-specific resource tracking
> error: sha1 information is lacking or useless
> (drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c).
> error: could not build fake ancestor
> Patch failed at 0002 RDMA/nldev: add provider-specific resource tracking
> 
> Please make sure you send patches against a stable commit when
> possible (eg for-next, or linus's tree) then I can usually fix the
> merge issues. But I generally won't try at all if the git doesn't have
> history.. too hard.

I'll rebase it.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux