On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 5:06 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:06:44AM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote: > > Allow INFINIBAND without INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS. > Why? We are pushing everyone heavily to use RDMA/CM, so making it > optional seems rather counter-intuitive. Bugs. We don't currently use CM. But fuzzy testing has been finding a fair number CM bugs, so we were thinking of disabling it until we need it. > You'll also have to fix tons of ULPs to explicitly depend on > INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS, or make code conditional on it. I think I've identified the set of options which use INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS without a kconfig depends: * CIFS_SMB_DIRECT * INFINIBAND_SRPT * NVME_RDMA * NVME_TARGET_RDMA I have patches for the above, but need to finish the commit logs. Let me know if they'll be nacked and I'll just patch my kernel and forget upstreaming. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
