On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 08:54 +0800, Yanjun Zhu wrote:
>
> On 2018/3/31 12:43, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Sat, 2018-03-31 at 00:18 -0400, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> > > + refcount_inc(&res->atomic.skb->users);
> >
> > Is this perhaps an open-coded skb_get() call? If so, why isn't skb_get()
> > called here?
>
> Thanks. There are some places that use refcount_inc instead of skb_get.
> I will fix it with skb_get later in a patch.
That's a weird approach. What prevents you from modifying this patch such
that it uses skb_get()?
Bart.
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
