Re: [PATCH rdma-rc] RDMA/ucma: Don't copy data for unknown AF family

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 06:33:30AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 01:45:40PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 11:10:27AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Ensure that user provides valid AF family prior to query device address.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: <syzbot+2a2c48fc189ed5125b9c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Fixes: ee7aed4528fb ("RDMA/ucma: Support querying for AF_IB addresses")
> > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >  drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c | 7 +++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c
> > > index 5db68d86070f..2178022badcc 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c
> > > @@ -879,10 +879,13 @@ static ssize_t ucma_query_addr(struct ucma_context *ctx,
> > >
> > >  	addr = (struct sockaddr *) &ctx->cm_id->route.addr.src_addr;
> > >  	resp.src_size = rdma_addr_size(addr);
> > > -	memcpy(&resp.src_addr, addr, resp.src_size);
> > > -
> > >  	addr = (struct sockaddr *) &ctx->cm_id->route.addr.dst_addr;
> > >  	resp.dst_size = rdma_addr_size(addr);
> > > +
> > > +	if (!resp.src_size || !resp.dst_size)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	memcpy(&resp.src_addr, addr, resp.src_size);
> > >  	memcpy(&resp.dst_addr, addr, resp.dst_size);
> >
> > Woah, no, NAK! Moving the memcpy without revising addr breaks it.
> 
> Ahh, right
> 
> >
> > .. and I don't understand this at all, how does 0 src_size cause a
> > null pointer deref?
> >
> > memcpy(a,b,0) is OK right?
> 
> In C it is ok, but KASAN complains about it.

That makes no sense.

The code in the syzkaller oops disassembles the faulting instruction
to

   movzbl (%rdx,%rax,1),%edx
    rdx = 0000000000000018
    rax = ffffffffffffffda

Which to me looks rather a lot like an err_ptr.. And nothing like a memcpy..

Since syzkaller says it is reproducing that without e8980d67d60 which
prevents err_ptr in cm_id, I wonder if this is just a dup?

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux