On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 05:41:51PM +0000, Kalderon, Michal wrote: > > From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:jgg@xxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 12:18 AM > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/main.c > > > b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/main.c > > > index db4bf97..7dbbe6d 100644 > > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/main.c > > > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ > > > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QLogic 40G/100G ROCE Driver"); > > > MODULE_AUTHOR("QLogic Corporation"); MODULE_LICENSE("Dual > > BSD/GPL"); > > > +MODULE_VERSION(QEDR_MODULE_VERSION); > > > > > > #define QEDR_WQ_MULTIPLIER_DFT (3) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/qedr.h > > > b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/qedr.h > > > index 86d4511..ab0d411 100644 > > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/qedr.h > > > @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ > > > #include "qedr_hsi_rdma.h" > > > > > > #define QEDR_NODE_DESC "QLogic 579xx RoCE HCA" > > > +#define QEDR_MODULE_VERSION "8.33.11.20" > > > + > > > > I thought we had a general prohibition against versions like this in mainline > > drivers? And what does this hunk have to do with supporting new firmware? > > > > Jason > I'm assuming you refer only to rdma in regards to version prohibition right ? as looking at all other vendors > (including Mellanox) all have module versions under net/ why is rdma different in this way ? > I now searched back mails on the topic and found an email from Leon where he stated: > " I am strongly against module versions. You should rely on official kernel version." > But it's not always the inbox driver that is installed or probed, the kernel version is not enough. > Given different distros, vanilla kernels, out of box drivers, etc... it is essential for us that based on > logs And modinfo we can determine the qed* drivers that are running. We actually stopped to maintain driver versions, just ensure that inbox, upstream and MLNX_OFED have different names. The discussion thread is here https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/2017-June/004426.html https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/2017-June/004441.html > > We have received complaints that our qedr module doesn't have a version whereas all of our other > components do (qed, qede, qedi, qedf). We decided to add the qedr version with the next version > update to align with the rest of the components. > > We can move the driver version bump into a different commit for all components, just made > sense to Add it to this one as it is the root of the version update. > Let me know if you think it is essential and I'll make the change for v2 > > Thanks, > Michal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature