Re: RFC on writel and writel_relaxed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/22/2018 8:52 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>> No, it's not sufficient.
> Just to clarify ... barrier() is just a compiler barrier, it means the
> compiler will generate things in the order they are written. This isn't
> sufficient on archs with an OO memory model, where an actual memory
> barrier instruction needs to be emited.

Surprisingly, ARM64 GCC compiler generates a write barrier as
opposed to preventing code reordering.

I was curious if this is an ARM only thing or not. 

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux