Re: [PATCH v6 rdma-core 2/2] libhns: Support cq record doorbell

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2018/3/15 4:30, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 09:53:05PM +0800, Yixian Liu wrote:
>> diff --git a/providers/hns/hns_roce_u_abi.h b/providers/hns/hns_roce_u_abi.h
>> index ec145bb..c4f36ec 100644
>> +++ b/providers/hns/hns_roce_u_abi.h
>> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ struct hns_roce_create_cq_resp {
>>  	struct ib_uverbs_create_cq_resp	ibv_resp;
>>  	__u32				cqn;
>>  	__u32				reserved;
>> +	__u64				cap_flags;
>>  };
> 
> This struct is wrong.. the kernel does this:
> 
>         if (context) {
>                 if ((hr_dev->caps.flags & HNS_ROCE_CAP_FLAG_RECORD_DB) &&
>                                         (udata->outlen == sizeof(resp))) {
>                         hr_cq->db_en = 1;
>                         resp.cqn = hr_cq->cqn;
>                         resp.cap_flags |= HNS_ROCE_SUPPORT_CQ_RECORD_DB;
>                         ret = ib_copy_to_udata(udata, &resp, sizeof(resp));
>                 } else
>                         ret = ib_copy_to_udata(udata, &hr_cq->cqn, sizeof(u64));
> 
> So 'cqn' should be a u64, it is a mistake in the userspace to have
> used a u32 here.
> 
> You could correct it, but it would need to be used as u32
> consistently.
> 
> Instead I recommend changing the above struct (in user and kernel) to
> simply:
> 
> struct hns_roce_ib_create_cq_resp {
> 	__u64 cqn;       /* Only 32 bits used, 64 for compat */
> 	__u64 cap_flags;
> };
> 
> And change the kernel to simply do:
> 
>         if (context) {
>                 resp.cqn = hr_cq->cqn;
>                 if ((hr_dev->caps.flags & HNS_ROCE_CAP_FLAG_RECORD_DB) &&
>                                         (udata->outlen == sizeof(resp))) {
>                         hr_cq->db_en = 1;
>                         resp.cap_flags |= HNS_ROCE_SUPPORT_CQ_RECORD_DB;
>                 }
>                 ret = ib_copy_to_udata(udata, &resp, sizeof(resp));
> 
> ib_copy_to_udata() will do the right thing.
> 
> Please send a patch for this immediately before this gets into a
> released kernel..
> 
> Also all these tests:
> 
>                 if ((hr_dev->caps.flags & HNS_ROCE_CAP_FLAG_RECORD_DB) &&
>                                         (udata->outlen == sizeof(resp)))
> 
> Should probably be:
> 
>                 if ((hr_dev->caps.flags & HNS_ROCE_CAP_FLAG_RECORD_DB) &&
>                                         (udata->outlen >= sizeof(resp)))
> 
> Arguably a flag should have been added to the request for this new
> behavior though, as is will limit what you can do in future.
> 
> Jason

Thank you very much! I will send the patch sets for kernel and userspace today.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux