Re: [PATCH 5/9] SUNRPC: Initialize rpc_rqst outside of xprt->reserve_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Mar 6, 2018, at 5:07 PM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 6, 2018, at 5:02 PM, Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Chuck,
>> 
>> I'm seeing a huge performance hit with this patch.  I'm just running cthon over TCP, and it goes from finishing in 22 seconds to taking well over 5 minutes.  I seem to only see this on the read and write tests, such as basic test5 taking a minute to finish:
>> 
>>   ./test5: read and write                                                                                       
>>           wrote 1048576 byte file 10 times in 60.35 seconds (173737 bytes/sec)                                  
>>           read 1048576 byte file 10 times in 0.0  seconds (-2147483648 bytes/sec)                               
>>           ./test5 ok. 
> 
> OK. This looks like write is impacted, but this test doesn't
> actually perform any reads on the wire. Try iozone with -I,
> maybe? That would show results for both read and write.

Hum.

Stock v4.16-rc4:

./test5: read and write
	wrote 1048576 byte file 10 times in 0.2  seconds (350811642 bytes/sec)
	read 1048576 byte file 10 times in 0.0  seconds (-2147483648 bytes/sec)
	./test5 ok.


v4.16-rc4 with my full set of patches:

./test5: read and write
	wrote 1048576 byte file 10 times in 0.2  seconds (354236681 bytes/sec)
	read 1048576 byte file 10 times in 0.0  seconds (-2147483648 bytes/sec)
	./test5 ok.

I don't see a regression here. Let me know how it goes!


>> I haven't dug into this too deeply, but my best guess is that maybe it's due to adding a call to xprt_request_init() in net/sunrpc/clnt.c:call_reserveresult()
> 
> It wasn't added there, it was moved from xprt_alloc_slot. So,
> it's not new work per-RPC.
> 
> Any additional information would be appreciated!
> 
> 
>> Thoughts?
>> Anna
>> 
>> On 03/05/2018 03:13 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> alloc_slot is a transport-specific op, but initializing an rpc_rqst
>>> is common to all transports. Move initialization to common code in
>>> preparation for adding a transport-specific alloc_slot to xprtrdma.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h |    1 +
>>> net/sunrpc/clnt.c           |    1 +
>>> net/sunrpc/xprt.c           |   12 +++++++-----
>>> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
>>> index 5fea0fb..9784e28 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
>>> @@ -324,6 +324,7 @@ struct xprt_class {
>>> struct rpc_xprt		*xprt_create_transport(struct xprt_create *args);
>>> void			xprt_connect(struct rpc_task *task);
>>> void			xprt_reserve(struct rpc_task *task);
>>> +void			xprt_request_init(struct rpc_task *task);
>>> void			xprt_retry_reserve(struct rpc_task *task);
>>> int			xprt_reserve_xprt(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct rpc_task *task);
>>> int			xprt_reserve_xprt_cong(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct rpc_task *task);
>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
>>> index 6e432ec..226f558 100644
>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
>>> @@ -1546,6 +1546,7 @@ void rpc_force_rebind(struct rpc_clnt *clnt)
>>> 	task->tk_status = 0;
>>> 	if (status >= 0) {
>>> 		if (task->tk_rqstp) {
>>> +			xprt_request_init(task);
>>> 			task->tk_action = call_refresh;
>>> 			return;
>>> 		}
>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
>>> index 70f0050..a394b46 100644
>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
>>> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
>>> * Local functions
>>> */
>>> static void	 xprt_init(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct net *net);
>>> -static void	xprt_request_init(struct rpc_task *, struct rpc_xprt *);
>>> +static __be32	xprt_alloc_xid(struct rpc_xprt *xprt);
>>> static void	xprt_connect_status(struct rpc_task *task);
>>> static int      __xprt_get_cong(struct rpc_xprt *, struct rpc_task *);
>>> static void     __xprt_put_cong(struct rpc_xprt *, struct rpc_rqst *);
>>> @@ -987,6 +987,8 @@ bool xprt_prepare_transmit(struct rpc_task *task)
>>> 		task->tk_status = -EAGAIN;
>>> 		goto out_unlock;
>>> 	}
>>> +	if (likely(!bc_prealloc(req)))
>>> +		req->rq_xid = xprt_alloc_xid(xprt);
>>> 	ret = true;
>>> out_unlock:
>>> 	spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
>>> @@ -1163,10 +1165,10 @@ void xprt_alloc_slot(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct rpc_task *task)
>>> out_init_req:
>>> 	xprt->stat.max_slots = max_t(unsigned int, xprt->stat.max_slots,
>>> 				     xprt->num_reqs);
>>> +	spin_unlock(&xprt->reserve_lock);
>>> +
>>> 	task->tk_status = 0;
>>> 	task->tk_rqstp = req;
>>> -	xprt_request_init(task, xprt);
>>> -	spin_unlock(&xprt->reserve_lock);
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xprt_alloc_slot);
>>> 
>>> @@ -1303,8 +1305,9 @@ static inline void xprt_init_xid(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
>>> 	xprt->xid = prandom_u32();
>>> }
>>> 
>>> -static void xprt_request_init(struct rpc_task *task, struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
>>> +void xprt_request_init(struct rpc_task *task)
>>> {
>>> +	struct rpc_xprt *xprt = task->tk_xprt;
>>> 	struct rpc_rqst	*req = task->tk_rqstp;
>>> 
>>> 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->rq_list);
>>> @@ -1312,7 +1315,6 @@ static void xprt_request_init(struct rpc_task *task, struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
>>> 	req->rq_task	= task;
>>> 	req->rq_xprt    = xprt;
>>> 	req->rq_buffer  = NULL;
>>> -	req->rq_xid     = xprt_alloc_xid(xprt);
>>> 	req->rq_connect_cookie = xprt->connect_cookie - 1;
>>> 	req->rq_bytes_sent = 0;
>>> 	req->rq_snd_buf.len = 0;
>>> 
> 
> --
> Chuck Lever
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
Chuck Lever



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux