On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:58:46PM +0200, Yuval Shaia wrote: > Add a command line option to allow selecting specific address as done in > rdma_client. > > Signed-off-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > librdmacm/examples/rdma_server.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/librdmacm/examples/rdma_server.c b/librdmacm/examples/rdma_server.c > index bcf649fe..77c021ac 100644 > --- a/librdmacm/examples/rdma_server.c > +++ b/librdmacm/examples/rdma_server.c > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ > #include <rdma/rdma_cma.h> > #include <rdma/rdma_verbs.h> > > +static const char *server = "127.0.0.1"; > static const char *port = "7471"; > > static struct rdma_cm_id *listen_id, *id; > @@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ static int run(void) > memset(&hints, 0, sizeof hints); > hints.ai_flags = RAI_PASSIVE; > hints.ai_port_space = RDMA_PS_TCP; > - ret = rdma_getaddrinfo(NULL, port, &hints, &res); > + ret = rdma_getaddrinfo(server, port, &hints, &res); In such case (server is going to be not-NULL), the AI_PASSIVE hint will be ignored by getaddrinfo, but don't know whenever it is safe to remove "hints.ai_flags = RAI_PASSIVE;" line above. What do you think? Thanks
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
