On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 08:18:27PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > + } else {
> > > + /* It is done in _ib_create_qp for other QP types */
> > > + qp->uobject = &obj->uevent.uobject;
> > > }
> >
> > Steve got rid of this line to make sure the uobject was init'd during
> > restrack add, so why is adding it back here OK for XRC?
>
> Steve got rid of this line to determine kernel vs. user QPs and not
> because of being XRC. XRC QPs are not participating in restrack
> and IB_QPT_XRC_TGT actually needs this qp->object to be initialized.
But can we not set it someplace where it doesn't break the restrack
assumption even though we don't care today?
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
