Re: [PATCH rdma-rc 13/15] IB/uverbs: Tidy uverbs_uobject_add

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/13/2018 5:18 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Maintaining the uobjects list is mandatory, hoist it into the common
rdma_alloc_commit_uobject() function and inline it as there is now
only one caller.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c | 13 ++++---------
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c
index 7aee1c0b9884..1cb6849b2231 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c
@@ -350,13 +350,6 @@ struct ib_uobject *rdma_alloc_begin_uobject(const struct uverbs_obj_type *type,
  	return type->type_class->alloc_begin(type, ucontext);
  }
-static void uverbs_uobject_add(struct ib_uobject *uobject)
-{
-	mutex_lock(&uobject->context->uobjects_lock);
-	list_add(&uobject->list, &uobject->context->uobjects);
-	mutex_unlock(&uobject->context->uobjects_lock);
-}
-
  static int __must_check remove_commit_idr_uobject(struct ib_uobject *uobj,
  						  enum rdma_remove_reason why)
  {
@@ -501,7 +494,6 @@ int rdma_explicit_destroy(struct ib_uobject *uobject)
static void alloc_commit_idr_uobject(struct ib_uobject *uobj)
  {
-	uverbs_uobject_add(uobj);
  	spin_lock(&uobj->context->ufile->idr_lock);
  	/*
  	 * We already allocated this IDR with a NULL object, so
@@ -517,7 +509,6 @@ static void alloc_commit_fd_uobject(struct ib_uobject *uobj)
  	struct ib_uobject_file *uobj_file =
  		container_of(uobj, struct ib_uobject_file, uobj);
- uverbs_uobject_add(&uobj_file->uobj);
  	fd_install(uobj_file->uobj.id, uobj->object);
  	/* This shouldn't be used anymore. Use the file object instead */
  	uobj_file->uobj.id = 0;
@@ -544,6 +535,10 @@ int rdma_alloc_commit_uobject(struct ib_uobject *uobj)
  	assert_uverbs_usecnt(uobj, true);
  	atomic_set(&uobj->usecnt, 0);
+ mutex_lock(&uobj->context->uobjects_lock);
+	list_add(&uobj->list, &uobj->context->uobjects);
+	mutex_unlock(&uobj->context->uobjects_lock);
+
  	uobj->type->type_class->alloc_commit(uobj);
  	up_read(&uobj->context->cleanup_rwsem);

From the subject it sounds like you are doing a cosmetic clean-up, but this is doing a bit more. You are ensuring the list_add is always going to be called by putting it in the common path. What about making that be the subject?

-Denny
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux