On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 16:38 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> enum {
> - MLX4_WQE_BIND_TYPE_2 = (1<<31),
> + MLX4_WQE_BIND_TYPE_2 = (1UL<<31),
> MLX4_WQE_BIND_ZERO_BASED = (1<<30),
> };
Hello Jason,
A quote from the C11 standard:
"The expression that defines the value of an enumeration constant shall be an
integer constant expression that has a value representable as an int. [ ... ]
Each enumerated type shall be compatible with char, a signed integer type, or
an unsigned integer type. The choice of type is implementation-defined but
shall be capable of representing the values of all the members of the
enumeration."
Does that mean that this change relies on extensions to the C standard?
Thanks,
Bart.��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
