On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 01:01:23PM +0100, Roman Penyaev wrote: > >> >> +static int ibtrs_ib_dev_init(struct ibtrs_ib_dev *d, struct ib_device >> >> *dev) >> >> +{ >> >> + int err; >> >> + >> >> + d->pd = ib_alloc_pd(dev, IB_PD_UNSAFE_GLOBAL_RKEY); >> >> + if (IS_ERR(d->pd)) >> >> + return PTR_ERR(d->pd); >> >> + d->dev = dev; >> >> + d->lkey = d->pd->local_dma_lkey; >> >> + d->rkey = d->pd->unsafe_global_rkey; >> >> + >> >> + err = ibtrs_query_device(d); >> >> + if (unlikely(err)) >> >> + ib_dealloc_pd(d->pd); >> >> + >> >> + return err; >> >> +} >> > >> > >> > I must say that this makes me frustrated.. We stopped doing these >> > sort of things long time ago. No way we can even consider accepting >> > the unsafe use of the global rkey exposing the entire memory space for >> > remote access permissions. >> > >> > Sorry for being blunt, but this protocol design which makes a concious >> > decision to expose unconditionally is broken by definition. >> >> I suppose we can also afford the same trick which nvme does: provide >> register_always module argument, can we? That can be also interesting >> to measure the performance difference. > > I can be firmer than Sagi - new code that has IB_PD_UNSAFE_GLOBAL_RKEY > at can not be accepted upstream. > > Once you get that fixed, you should go and read my past comments on > how to properly order dma mapping and completions and fix that > too. Then redo your performance.. Clear. -- Roman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html