RE: [PATCH RFC 2/2] RDMA/nldev: provide detailed CM_ID information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > 182,6 +199,7 @@ static int fill_res_info(struct sk_buff *msg, struct
ib_device
> > *device)
> >  		[RDMA_RESTRACK_PD] = "pd",
> >  		[RDMA_RESTRACK_CQ] = "cq",
> >  		[RDMA_RESTRACK_QP] = "qp",
> > +		[RDMA_RESTRACK_CM_ID] = "cm_id",
> 
> May be rdmacm_id a better name to avoid confusion with ib_cm/iw_cm ids?

Eventually, I could see the ib_cm and/or iw_cm info also getting dumped as
part of this.  So perhaps the name "cm_id" is ok?  I prefer it also because
its shorter (lazy typer! :) )



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux