On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 01:48:58PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:17:23AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Track create and destroy operations of PD objects. > > > > Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <markb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c | 2 ++ > > drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c | 5 +++++ > > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c > > index 3e95acd29de7..256934d1f64f 100644 > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c > > @@ -340,6 +340,8 @@ ssize_t ib_uverbs_alloc_pd(struct ib_uverbs_file *file, > > uobj->object = pd; > > memset(&resp, 0, sizeof resp); > > resp.pd_handle = uobj->id; > > + pd->res.type = RDMA_RESTRACK_PD; > > + rdma_restrack_add(&pd->res); > > This pattern happens a lot, any reason not to add type to the > signature of rdma_restrack_add ? In early versions, I used the suggested signature, but found it clumsy and liked more this patter, where all restrack functions operates or on the entry or on the root. > > Jason
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature