Re: [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/mlx5; Remove redundant allocation warning print

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:02:12PM +0200, Yuval Shaia wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 02:34:24PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The kmalloc() failure to allocate memory generates enough information
> > and doesn't need to be accompanied by another driver print.
> >
> > Fixes: d69a24e03659 ("IB/mlx5: Move IB event processing onto a workqueue")
>
> Didn't found it in:
> https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma/
> branch rdma-next and didn't find it.
> Where should i look?

In official place:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=d69a24e036596877ce08c25ab8e63a202412fd9e

>
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
> > index f282e281eff2..91688352b5d7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
> > @@ -3345,19 +3345,17 @@ static void mlx5_ib_event(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, void *context,
> >  	struct mlx5_ib_event_work *work;
> >
> >  	work = kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > -	if (work) {
> > -		INIT_WORK(&work->work, mlx5_ib_handle_event);
> > -		work->dev = dev;
> > -		work->param = param;
> > -		work->context = context;
> > -		work->event = event;
> > -
> > -		queue_work(mlx5_ib_event_wq, &work->work);
> > +	if (!work)
> >  		return;
> > -	}
> >
> > -	dev_warn(&dev->pdev->dev, "%s: mlx5_dev_event: %d, with param: %lu dropped, couldn't allocate memory.\n",
> > -		 __func__, event, param);
> > +	INIT_WORK(&work->work, mlx5_ib_handle_event);
> > +	work->dev = dev;
> > +	work->param = param;
> > +	work->context = context;
> > +	work->event = event;
> > +
> > +	queue_work(mlx5_ib_event_wq, &work->work);
> > +	return;
>
> We don't really need this last "return", right?

Right, I'll remove it now.

Thanks

>
> >  }
> >
> >  static int set_has_smi_cap(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev)
> > --
> > 2.15.1
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux