On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 09:35 -0600, Steve Wise wrote:
> > + if (wait_for_completion_timeout(&qp->srq_completion, 10 * HZ) > 0)
> > + ib_process_cq_direct(cq, -1);
> > +}
>
> Perhaps a WARN_ONCE is warranted?
Agreed. I would also like to see a WARN_ONCE() if the timeout expires before
the completion has been signaled.
Bart.��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
