On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 07:15:02PM +0200, jackm wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 10:02:28 -0700 > Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 07:58:38AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > So, my take on the for-rc8-ness, based on the commit messages alone: > > > Jack Morgenstein (1): > > > IB/mlx4: Fix incorrectly releasing steerable UD QPs when have > > > only ETH ports > > > > No, only supresses an annoying warning > > It does not "suppress" the warning, it fixes the bug which caused > the warning to be written in the log. > > It is true that at present the annoying (and worrisome) warning in the > log is the only problem resulting from this bug Well, that is what I was trying to say. > -- but it is still a bug, and needs to be fixed. And it will be fixed, the only question here is if it should be fixed in 4.15 or 4.16 I think Linus would yell at Doug and I if we sent a patch whose only outcome was to remove a warning at this point in the cycle. Does anyone know differently? Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html