On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 07:47:27PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 17:31 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > +struct rdma_restrack_entry {
> > + struct list_head list;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The entries are filled during rdma_restrack_add,
> > + * can be attempted to be free during rdma_restrack_del.
> > + *
> > + * As an example for that, see mlx5 QPs with type MLX5_IB_QPT_HW_GSI
> > + */
> > + bool valid;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Sleepabale RCU to protect object data.
> > + */
> > + struct srcu_struct srcu;
> > +
> > + struct task_struct *task;
> > + char *task_comm;
> > +};
>
> Please use the kernel-doc syntax to document the meaning of the names of the
> fields in this structure. It is e.g. nontrivial to guess what "task_comm" stands
> for. The presense of a task_struct pointer is also nontrivial.
>
> PS: I think the spelling of "Sleepabale" should be fixed.
I'll fix and resend.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
