On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 07:41 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> I'm always a bit cautious when having rcu_read_lock() and
> rcu_read_unlock() in two separate functions.
> Can we make this dependency more explicit by renaming the first function
> to blk_start_wait_if_quiesced() and updating the comment to the effect
> that both functions must be used in tandem?
Hello Hannes,
That sounds like a good idea to me. I will make these changes and repost this
patch series.
Bart.��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���fk��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
