On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 18:12 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 13:06 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > > No, the target code is likewise clueless about namespaces. I suspect > > (although I haven't looked) that the target code's Add RDMACM support > > patch will have the same problem. > > Hello Doug, > > The target code already allows to configure ACL (access control lists) that > control which initiator systems are allowed to log in and which ones not. Are > you sure that it will be valuable to add network namespace support to the > RDMA/CM code in the SRP target driver? I haven't really thought about it much. My comment wasn't that I thought it should be implemented, just that my quick grep of init_net in the drivers/infiniband directory showed me that the srpt driver doesn't distinguish any namespaces (while the isert driver does), so I suspect adding rdmacm support will add a new init_net usage. -- Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part