On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 04:50:44PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:57:34AM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > > Allow a ULP to ask the core to implicitly assign a completion > > queue to a queue-pair based on a least-used search on a per-device > > cq pools. The device CQ pools grow in a lazy fashion with every > > QP creation. > > > > In addition, expose an affinity hint for a queue pair creation. > > If passed, the core will attempt to attach a CQ with a completion > > vector that is directed to the cpu core as the affinity hint > > provided. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sagi, Bart, > > Did we reach a conclusion on this? Is v3 the series to take, and > should it all go through the RDMA tree? It looks like there are some > missing acks for that?? > > I think there was also an unapplied comment from bart in the > patchworks notes... > > Could you please add some commit messages when you resend it? Not sure > I should be accepting such large commits with empty messages??? Hearing nothing, I've dropped this series off patchworks. Please resend it when you are ready. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
