Re: [PATCH for-next 2/2] RDMA/hns: Fix alignment problem of the doorbell

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2017/12/26 16:15, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 09:37:19PM +0800, Yixian Liu wrote:
>> The array defined for doorbell is not guaranteed to be 64 bit
>> aligned while we write it to the hardware with 64 bit
>> alignment required.
>>
>> This patch fixes this problem by defining a union for doorbell
>> to make sure it 64 bit alignment.
> 
> Are you sure that it gives you alignment?
> The macros ALIGN/PTR_ALIGN are usually used for that.

Hi Leon,

I have considered your doubt combined with Jason's previous comment.
With a union defined with u64 member and assign the wanted value to it,
then we can deref *(u64 *)doorbell for the correct value.

In this patch set, the assignment is missed.
Thanks for your comment and I will fix it in v2.

> 
> Thanks
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yixian Liu <liuyixian@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <oulijun@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Hu (Xavier) <xavier.huwei@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h |  5 +++++
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c  | 16 ++++++++--------
>>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
>> index dde5178..defc4ee 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
>> @@ -569,6 +569,11 @@ struct hns_roce_eq_table {
>>  	void __iomem		**eqc_base; /* only for hw v1 */
>>  };
>>
>> +union hns_roce_db {
>> +	u64	doorbell64;
>> +	u32	doorbell[2];
>> +};
>> +
>>  struct hns_roce_caps {
>>  	u8		num_ports;
>>  	int		gid_table_len[HNS_ROCE_MAX_PORTS];
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
>> index 7f393f6..ee26bbd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
>> @@ -3172,33 +3172,33 @@ static int hns_roce_v2_modify_cq(struct ib_cq *cq, u16 cq_count, u16 cq_period)
>>
>>  static void set_eq_cons_index_v2(struct hns_roce_eq *eq)
>>  {
>> -	u32 doorbell[2];
>> +	union hns_roce_db db;
>>
>> -	doorbell[0] = 0;
>> -	doorbell[1] = 0;
>> +	db.doorbell[0] = 0;
>> +	db.doorbell[1] = 0;
>>
>>  	if (eq->type_flag == HNS_ROCE_AEQ) {
>> -		roce_set_field(doorbell[0], HNS_ROCE_V2_EQ_DB_CMD_M,
>> +		roce_set_field(db.doorbell[0], HNS_ROCE_V2_EQ_DB_CMD_M,
>>  			       HNS_ROCE_V2_EQ_DB_CMD_S,
>>  			       eq->arm_st == HNS_ROCE_V2_EQ_ALWAYS_ARMED ?
>>  			       HNS_ROCE_EQ_DB_CMD_AEQ :
>>  			       HNS_ROCE_EQ_DB_CMD_AEQ_ARMED);
>>  	} else {
>> -		roce_set_field(doorbell[0], HNS_ROCE_V2_EQ_DB_TAG_M,
>> +		roce_set_field(db.doorbell[0], HNS_ROCE_V2_EQ_DB_TAG_M,
>>  			       HNS_ROCE_V2_EQ_DB_TAG_S, eq->eqn);
>>
>> -		roce_set_field(doorbell[0], HNS_ROCE_V2_EQ_DB_CMD_M,
>> +		roce_set_field(db.doorbell[0], HNS_ROCE_V2_EQ_DB_CMD_M,
>>  			       HNS_ROCE_V2_EQ_DB_CMD_S,
>>  			       eq->arm_st == HNS_ROCE_V2_EQ_ALWAYS_ARMED ?
>>  			       HNS_ROCE_EQ_DB_CMD_CEQ :
>>  			       HNS_ROCE_EQ_DB_CMD_CEQ_ARMED);
>>  	}
>>
>> -	roce_set_field(doorbell[1], HNS_ROCE_V2_EQ_DB_PARA_M,
>> +	roce_set_field(db.doorbell[1], HNS_ROCE_V2_EQ_DB_PARA_M,
>>  		       HNS_ROCE_V2_EQ_DB_PARA_S,
>>  		       (eq->cons_index & HNS_ROCE_V2_CONS_IDX_M));
>>
>> -	hns_roce_write64_k(doorbell, eq->doorbell);
>> +	hns_roce_write64_k(db.doorbell, eq->doorbell);
>>
>>  	/* Make sure we update the consumer index of EQ before
>>  	 * accessing it later
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux