On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 09:51:34PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > This for-rc/for-next thing is new for me. In RDMA, we didn't bother ourselves too > much and sent everything to for-next. Okay.. But I think it helps distros if we classify our work a little more finely, eg anything that merged through the for-rc should be inspected more closely for distro or stable backporting. The dependencies are easy enough to deal with if you mark them in the cover letter. And I prefer a workflow where the series are smaller, focused on a topic and more often than in a giant patch bomb once per release. At least so far anyhow.. Though, I know Doug works quite differently. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html