Re: [RFC PATCH rdma-next 02/14] RDMA/core: Enforce requirement to hold lists_rwsem semaphore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 09:51:34PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:

> This for-rc/for-next thing is new for me. In RDMA, we didn't bother ourselves too
> much and sent everything to for-next.

Okay.. But I think it helps distros if we classify our work a little
more finely, eg anything that merged through the for-rc should be
inspected more closely for distro or stable backporting.

The dependencies are easy enough to deal with if you mark them in the
cover letter.

And I prefer a workflow where the series are smaller, focused on a
topic and more often than in a giant patch bomb once per release. At
least so far anyhow..

Though, I know Doug works quite differently.

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux