On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 03:45:19PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 01:42:44PM -0800, Bryan Tan wrote: > > > If you want this in -rc for some reason then you need to send a series > > > with just those commits, otherwise it will go to -next. > > > > I will send out a series with the following commits: > > > > > RDMA/vmw_pvrdma: Call ib_umem_release on destroy QP path > > > RDMA/vmw_pvrdma: Use refcount_dec_and_test to avoid warning > > > RDMA/vmw_pvrdma: Use completion instead of wait queue > > > RDMA/vmw_pvrdma: Add UAR SRQ macros in ABI header file > > > > And I will clarify the commit message in the last commit there. > > Okay, you'll need to rebase the reminaing patches on to the for-rc > patches and send them again.. I would have cherry-picked them > but the refcounter change created conflicts I didn't want to deal > with. Ah okay. Should I send them together now? I was going to wait until the for-rc bits make it to for-next before sending out the remaining patches as they wouldn't apply cleanly to for-next right now. Bryan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
