On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:03:51AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 13:36 +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 10:02 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > [] > > > Also, I agree with other reviewers, there is no excuse for adding > > > checkpatch specifics per-subsystem/folder, the differences are better > > > to be treated in checkpatch.pl itself. > > What other reviewers are those? I saw responses from Stephen and Jason. > > As a checkpatch maintainer, I don't believe it's appropriate > to add many per-subsystem specific rules to checkpatch. There are not so much differences, I'm aware of only one specific subsystem - netdev. The rest of the kernel more or less follows general CodingStyle and don't need anything specific in checkpatch.pl Thanks > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
