Hi Jason, Thanks for your message. This patch-set has been tested okay both on for-next and for-rc. I assume that the patch-set should go to for-next branch as it is about irq feature. What's your opinion? On 2017/12/11 23:49, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 04:55:23PM +0800, Liuyixian (Eason) wrote: >> Hi Jason, >> >> This patch-set was based on Doug's RDMA tree: >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dledford/rdma.git >> >> Should I resend this patch-set based on the new shared RDMA git tree? >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git > > At this point it needs to apply cleanly on rc2 which is what is on the > rdma tree right now. > > If it doesn't then you need to retest/resend.. > > Jason > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
