On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 04:28:09PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 11:03:26AM -0800, Bryan Tan wrote:
> > Add the two UAR SRQ macros that are required by the userlevel
> > library.
> >
> > Fixes: 8b10ba783c9d ("RDMA/vmw_pvrdma: Add shared receive queue support")
> > Reviewed-by: Adit Ranadive <aditr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Aditya Sarwade <asarwade@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Bryan Tan <bryantan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > include/uapi/rdma/vmw_pvrdma-abi.h | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/vmw_pvrdma-abi.h b/include/uapi/rdma/vmw_pvrdma-abi.h
> > index aaa352f..4007cac 100644
> > +++ b/include/uapi/rdma/vmw_pvrdma-abi.h
> > @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@
> > #define PVRDMA_UAR_CQ_ARM_SOL BIT(29) /* Arm solicited bit. */
> > #define PVRDMA_UAR_CQ_ARM BIT(30) /* Arm bit. */
> > #define PVRDMA_UAR_CQ_POLL BIT(31) /* Poll bit. */
> > +#define PVRDMA_UAR_SRQ_OFFSET 8 /* SRQ doorbell. */
> > +#define PVRDMA_UAR_SRQ_RECV BIT(30) /* Recv bit. */
>
> I didn't think BIT() was allowed in uapi headers? Where does it get
> defined in user space?
>
> Jason
Looks like we had BIT() defined in userspace. Seems like the rest of
the headers just use a bit shift? If that's fine I can send out a V2
with the BIT()s removed.
Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
